green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Ramirez
Thus, the People established that defendant “cause[d] a false entry in the business records of an enterprise” (§ 175.05 [1]), i.e., that she returned merchandise that she had not in fact purchased, and that she thereby “inten[ded] ... to aid or conceal [her] commission” of the crime of petit larceny (§ 175.10; see People v Weaver, 89 AD3d 1477, 1478 [2011]; People v Hopkins, 28 AD3d 1244, 1244 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 790 [2006]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Ramirez
Thus, the People established that defendant “cause[d] a false entry in the business records of an enterprise” (§ 175.05 [1]), i.e., that she returned merchandise that she had not in fact purchased, and that she thereby “inten[ded] ... to aid or conceal [her] commission” of the crime of petit larceny (§ 175.10; see People v Weaver, 89 AD3d 1477, 1478 [2011]; People v Hopkins, 28 AD3d 1244, 1244 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 790 [2006]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Adoption of Kaitlin R., an Infant. Janis R., Respondent Gina M.R.
Appeal No. 2.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 28, 2006.
Published
from an order of the Family Court, Wyoming County (Michael F. Griffith, J.), entered December 30, 2004 in an adoption proceeding. The order granted the petition.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Kaitlin R. ([appeal No. 1] 28 AD3d 1243 [2006]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Smith and Pine, JJ.