Kristina Denise Enter., Inc. v. Arnold, 41 A.D.3d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Kristina Denise Enter., Inc. v. Arnold, 41 A.D.3d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Silverman v. KPMG LLP (In Re Allou Distributors, Inc.) (nyeb, 2008-09-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Silverman v. KPMG LLP (In Re Allou Distributors, Inc.)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2008 · confidence medium
The Elements of a Professional Malpractice Claim To state a professional malpractice claim under New York law, a plaintiff must allege that “there was a departure from the accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of the injury.” Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v. Arnold, 41 A.D.3d 788, 788 , 838 N.Y.S.2d 667, 668 (2d Dep’t 2007).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Galvan v. Robinson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · confidence medium
Accordingly, the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ opposing papers need not be considered (see Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788, 789 [2007]; O’Leary v Bravo Hylan, LLC, 8 AD3d 542 [2004]; Berkowitz v Decker Transp.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rockman v. Bartlett
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · confidence medium
To establish that he is entitled to summary judgment, plaintiff bears the initial burden of presenting competent, prima facie evidence that the accounting services that defendants rendered on his behalf were negligently performed and that, as a result, he incurred costs and expenses that would otherwise have not been sustained (see Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788, 788-789 [2007]; Cumis Ins.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Parmalat Securities Litigation
S.D.N.Y. · 2007 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Fraternity Fund, 479 F.Supp.2d at 370-71 (aiding and abetting fraud and breach of fiduciary duty); First Capital Asset *579 Mgmt., Inc. v. Brickellbush, Inc., 218 F.Supp.2d 369, 379 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (federal RICO); Duane Jones Co. v. Burke, 306 N.Y. 172, 190-91 , 117 N.E.2d 237, 246 (1954) (civil conspiracy); Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v. Arnold, 41 A.D.3d 788 , 838 N.Y.S.2d 667, 667 (2d Dep’t 2007) (accounting malpractice); Gerber Trade Finance, Inc. v. Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler, LLP, 12 A.D.3d 286, 286 , 786 N.Y.S.2d 9, 10 (1st Dep't 2004) (negligent misrepresentation); Laub…
discussed Cited "see" Incorporated Vil. of Freeport v. Albrecht, Viggiano, Zurich & Co., P.C.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
"In order to succeed on a claim for accounting malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of injury" ( Alskom Realty, LLC v Baranik , 189 AD3d 745, 747 ; see Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold , 41 AD3d 788, 788 ).
cited Cited "see" Town of Kinderhook v. Vona
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Socy. v Tooke, 293 AD2d 794, 796 [2002]; see Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788, 788-789 [2007]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kristina Denise Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Sandra Arnold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 26, 2007.
41 A.D.3d 788
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for professional malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurkin-Torres, J.), dated December 21, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A claim of malpractice requires proof that there was a departure from the accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of the injury (see D.D. Hamilton Textiles v Estate of Mate, 269 AD2d 214 [2000]; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483 [1998]). The plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of malpractice since there[*789] was no evidence to support a finding that the alleged negligence proximately caused their injuries (see e.g. Merz v Seaman, 265 AD2d 385, 389 [1999]). Even if, as the plaintiffs alleged, the defendants departed from generally-accepted accounting principles in their preparation of a compilation report on the plaintiffs’ financial statements (see Italia Imports v Weisberg & Lesk, 220 AD2d 226 [1995]), the plaintiffs failed to establish, prima facie, that their injuries were proximately caused by such departure rather than their “severe financial distress and inability to meet tax obligations” (D.D. Hamilton Textiles v Estate of Mate, supra at 215). Since the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden, the sufficiency of the opposing papers need not be considered (see e.g. O’Leary v Bravo Hylan, LLC, 8 AD3d 542 [2004]).

In addition, the defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating through their expert’s affidavit that any departures from the accepted standards of practice were not a proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ alleged injuries. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact through the affidavit of their purported expert, who was not a licensed or registered certified public accountant (see O’Boy v Motor Coach Indus., Inc., 39 AD3d 512 [2007]; see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.