People v. Ramirez, 43 A.D.3d 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Ramirez, 43 A.D.3d 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Cook (nyappdiv, 2008-03-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Cook
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
Accordingly, as the People correctly concede, “the failure of a court to advise of postrelease supervision [at the time of the plea] requires reversal of the conviction” (People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]; see People v Pagan, 43 AD3d at 1086 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Robert Ramirez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Sep 18, 2007.
43 A.D.3d 1086
Published

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered September 9, 2004, convicting him of[*1087] robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

To the extent that the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel involves matter dehors the record, it may not be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Villacreses, 12 AD3d 624, 626 [2004]; People v Aguirre, 304 AD2d 771 [2003]). Insofar as we are able to review the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 565-566 [2000]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]). Mastro, J.P., Covello, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.