Burgess v. Goord, 45 A.D.3d 1144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). · Go Syfert
Burgess v. Goord, 45 A.D.3d 1144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Scott v. Department of Correctional Services (nyappdiv, 2008-04-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Scott v. Department of Correctional Services
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · confidence medium
The misbehavior report, together with testimony adduced at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Martin v Goord, 46 AD3d 1294, 1295 [2007]; Matter of Burgess v Goord, 45 AD3d 1144, 1145 [2007]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Zaire v. Artus
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · confidence medium
Petitioner’s allegation that the Hearing Officer was biased is unsubstantiated in the record and, in any event, there is no indication that the determination in issue flowed from any purported bias (see Matter of Burgess v Goord, 45 AD3d 1144, 1145 [2007]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sanders v. Goord
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · confidence medium
The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of the victim provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Burgess v Goord, 45 AD3d 1144, 1145 [2007]; Matter of Goberdhan v Goord, 7 AD3d 897, 897 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Herbert Burgess
v.
Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 21, 2007.
45 A.D.3d 1144
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County)[*1145] to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, an inmate, was found to be in possession of two law library books, one of which was concealed by a cover and the other having the library marking torn out. At the conclusion of the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of smuggling, altering items and damaging state property. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and testimony adduced at the hearing (see Matter of Fontaine v Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, 35 AD3d 1113, 1113-1114 [2006], appeal dismissed 8 NY3d 943 [2007]). Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, there is no indication in the record that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination at hand flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Nieves v Goord, 39 AD3d 1104, 1105 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining contention that he was improperly denied the right to call a witness has been examined and found to be unavailing.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.