People v. Ortiz, 52 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Ortiz, 52 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …failing to originate, follow, and/or consistently apply generally accepted accounting principles and generally accepted auditing standards in its analysis of the trusts' reserve liabilities and financial conditions, at p. 417 ⚠ not in text
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: New York State Workers' Compensation Board v. SGRisk, LLC (nyappdiv, 2014-04-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) New York State Workers' Compensation Board v. SGRisk, LLC
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · confidence medium
Partnership v Kaplan & Kaplan, PLLC, 52 AD3d 417, 417 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 707 [2008]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) New York State Workers' Compensation Board v. SGRisk, LLC
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · confidence medium
Partnership v Kaplan & Kaplan, PLLC, 52 AD3d 417, 417 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 707 [2008]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Ambioris Ortiz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 26, 2008.
52 A.D.3d 417
Published

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J., at plea and sentence), rendered on or about July 24, 2005, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v [*418] Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.