green
Positive treatment
0.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. International Conference of Police Ass'ns
The statute in effect at the time of Pitt v Davison (supra) (2 Rev Stat [1st ed] 534; 2 R S part 3, ch 8, tit 13; see, also, Voorhies Code of Pro [8th ed], § 417, p 834 et seq.) provided for contempt proceedings not'materially different from those in force today (cf. Judiciary Law, § 750 et seq.) and at the times Billingsley (supra), James (supra) and Balt (supra), were decided with a major exception; the Revised Statutes, at sections 2 and 3 provided: "§ 2.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Jean-Francois de B. de Gautret
v.
Emily King de B. de Gautret
v.
Emily King de B. de Gautret
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 10, 1969.
Published
Order and judgment (one paper)[*518] entered on February 18, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Special Term. No opinion. Concur — Eager, J. F., MeGivern, Markewich, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.