green
Positive treatment
published
11.7 score
Cited for
At page 557 The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There…2 citing cases
- People v. De Leon Garcia (Simon), 74 Misc. 3d 129(A) (N.Y. App. Term. 2022).unpublishedContrary to defendant's contention, the reliable identifications by the victim - who "got a very good look peripherally" at defendant - and the officer, who observed defendant in close proximity with an "unobstructed" view throughout the i…
- People v. McCain (Malik), No. 2018 NYSlipOp 50929(U) (N.Y. App. Term. June 21, 2018).publishedIn addition to reliable identifications by the victim and an undercover officer, the latter having followed defendant immediately after the subway incident ( see People v Horsford , 68 AD3d 556, 557 [2009] , lv denied 14 NY3d 801 [2010], t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Alford Horsford
v.
Alford Horsford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 17, 2009.
Published opinion
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
[*557] The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification, including its resolution of alleged inconsistencies in testimony. The identification was particularly reliable because the undercover officer followed defendant after the sale and led the field team to him. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.