Gomez v. Lozado, 53 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976). · Go Syfert
Gomez v. Lozado, 53 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Joseph v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. (nyappdiv, 2013-11-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Joseph v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
Corp., 53 AD2d 614, 614 [1976]; Hauswirth v American Home Assur.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Joseph v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
Corp., 53 AD2d 614, 614 [1976]; Hauswirth v American Home Assur.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Rafael Gomez
v.
Lavinia Lozado
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 1, 1976.
53 A.D.2d 614
Published

In a habeas corpus proceeding to obtain custody of an infant, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 18, 1976, which, after a hearing, inter alia, awarded custody to[*615] respondent. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and writ sustained. The findings of fact are affirmed. Respondent is directed to return the infant to the custody of petitioner, his natural father, within 10 days after the termination of the present school term. Petitioner was found to be a fit parent and not to have abandoned his son. Under the circumstances he is entitled to custody as against the respondent (see Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 51 AD2d 544; Matter of Spence-Chapin Adoption Serv. v Polk, 29 NY2d 196). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.