People v. Russell, 55 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Russell, 55 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Morrison v. Morrison (nyappdiv, 1978-07-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morrison v. Morrison
N.Y. App. Div. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
As we have previously stated many times, a temporary award is based on conflicting affidavits and "is to be remedied by a speedy trial, where the true facts concerning the finances and standard of living of the parties can more accurately be ascertained.” (Rappeport v Rappeport, 46 AD2d 756, 757 ; see, also, Klein v Klein, 55 AD2d 885 ; Gross v Gross, 44 AD2d 806 ; Moss v Moss, 63 AD2d 896 .) One other comment is required.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Macken v. Macken
N.Y. App. Div. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
As we have previously stated many times, a temporary award is based on conflicting affidavits and "is to be remedied by a speedy trial, where the true facts concerning the finances and standard of living of the parties can more accurately be ascertained.” (Rappeport v Rappeport, 46 AD2d 756, 757 ; see, also, Klein v Klein, 55 AD2d 885 ; Gross v Gross, 44 AD2d 806 .) Concur— Kupferman, J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Thomas Russell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 25, 1977.
55 A.D.2d 885
1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10099
Published

On this appeal from a judgment, rendered on November 29, 1974, in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of rape in the first degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate period of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years, assigned counsel, after conscientiously examining the record, has sought leave to withdraw. The application is supported by a brief in compliance with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833) (see, also, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Counsel has concluded that the record in this case does not reveal any valid appealable issue. After a review of the record and proceedings in this case, the court agrees with counsel for appellant that there are no issues of substantial validity to be raised on this appeal. Accordingly, the application by counsel to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of conviction is unanimously affirmed. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Murphy, Silverman and Nunez, JJ.