People v. Portillo, 95 A.D.3d 1361 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). · Go Syfert
People v. Portillo, 95 A.D.3d 1361 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Jose Portillo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 30, 2012.
95 A.D.3d 1361
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), rendered November 24, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at the sentencing proceeding is without merit. Specifically, counsel was not ineffective for failing to request that the sentencing court impose a sentence even more lenient than what was promised by the Supreme Court at the plea proceeding, especially when the presentence report indicated that the defendant failed to truly take responsibility for stabbing the unarmed victim in the back, as the victim was fleeing from him (see People v Abrams, 272 AD2d 406 [2000]; see generally People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137,147 [1981]; Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Balkin, J.P, Leventhal, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.