green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hausler v. Spectra Realty, Inc.
While plaintiffs’ bill of particulars may serve as an affidavit for purposes of the summary judgment motion (CPLR 105 [t]; see, Hladczuk v Epstein, 98 AD2d 990 ), the conversation referenced therein is hearsay; while hearsay may be admitted on a motion for summary judgment in some circumstances (see, Landisi v Beacon Community Dev.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knowle v. Kane
Memorandum: Mandamus, like prohibition, is an extraordinary remedy and it is not appropriate in this case (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12,16 ; see also, Matter of Okereke v Kane, 98 AD2d 990 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louise A. Czyczerski
v.
Somebody's House of Syracuse, Inc.
v.
Somebody's House of Syracuse, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 16, 1983.
Published
— Judgment unanimously modified by increasing the amount of the award to $30,000, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: Following defendants’ default in this personal injury action, damages were assessed by the court without a jury in the amount of $8,000. In view of the uncontested proof of medical expenses, lost earnings, pain and suffering and permanent disability the award is increased to $30,000 (CPLR 5522). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Aronson, J. — negligence.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.