Moschella v. Romano, 110 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Moschella v. Romano, 110 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Francis Moschella
v.
Anita Romano, as Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 8, 1985.
110 A.D.2d 702
1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48597
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

[*703] Based upon the evidence presented before the agency, we cannot say that the denial of petitioner’s application for Emergency Assistance for Adults was arbitrary or capricious (see, Social Services Law § 303 [1] [m]; 18 NYCRR 397.5 [1] [2]).

Petitioner contends for the first time in this proceeding that the local agency gave him inadequate notice of the denial of benefits. As this issue was not raised before the agency, it has not been preserved for this court’s review. In any event, the notice was adequate (see, Matter of Schevchik v Blum, 89 AD2d 680; Matter of Herring v Blum, 68 AD2d 64).

We have considered such other of petitioner’s contentions as have been preserved for our review and find them to be lacking in merit. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.