Patricia A. Wilson v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 991 F.2d 809 (Fed. Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Patricia A. Wilson v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 991 F.2d 809 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jess Davies v. Department of the Army (mspb, 2022-08-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jess Davies v. Department of the Army
MSPB · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. Office of Personnel Management, 55 M.S.P.R. 105 , 108 (1992), aff’d, 991 F.2d 809 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Nucor Corp. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Torrington Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 220 , 225, 790 F.Supp. 1161, 1169 (1992), aff'd, 991 F.2d 809 , 1993 WL 56597 (Fed.Cir.1993); see also Timken Co. v. United States, 27 CIT 605 , 616, 264 F.Supp.2d 1264, 1274-75 (2003); Mukand Ltd. v. United States, 20 CIT 903 , 906, 937 F.Supp. 910, 914 (1996) (“[T]he Commission, as the trier of fact, has considerable discretion in weighing the probative value and relevance of evidence.”).
cited Cited "see" Nevinnomysskiy Azot v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2007 · signal: accord · confidence high
Cir. 2005); accord Torrington Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 220 , 224, 790 F. Supp. 1161, 1167-68 (1992), aff'd, 991 F.2d 809 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" Timken Co. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Torrington Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 220 , 226, 790 F.Supp. 1161, 1169 (1992), aff'd mem., 991 F.2d 809 , 1993 WL 56597 (Fed.Cir.1993); see also Coalition for Preservation of Am.
cited Cited "see" Kern-Liebers USA, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Torrington Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 220 , 229, 790 F. Supp. 1161, 1172 (1992), aff’d, 991 F.2d 809 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gold East Paper (JIANGSU) Co. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Torrington Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 220 , 226, 790 F.Supp. 1161, 1167 (1992), aff'd, 991 F.2d 809 (Fed.Cir.1993) (“[I]t is not the Court’s function to decide that it would have made another decision on the basis of the evidence.”) (citing Matsushita Elec.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Acciai Speciali Terni S.P.A. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
The ITC, however, need not explicitly discuss every piece of record evidence, and the evidence cited by Plaintiffs does not show the Commission’s determination to be unsupported. 21 See Nakajima *1314 All Co. v. United States, 14 CIT 469 , 478, 744 F.Supp. 1168, 1175 (1990) (holding that the ITC is “presumed ... to have considered all pertinent information sought to be brought to its attention”); see also Torrington Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 220 , 224, 790 F.Supp. 1161, 1168 (1992) (“[T]here is no statutory requirement that the Commission must respond to each piece of evidence prese…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Companhia Paulista De Ferro-Ligas v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 95-57 at 39-40 (Apr. 3, 1995); see also Torrington Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 220 , 224, 790 F. Supp. 1161, 1167 (1992) (stating “ [t]he fact that certain information is not discussed in a Commission determination does not establish that the Commission failed to consider that information”), aff’d, 991 F.2d 809 (Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patricia A. Wilson
v.
Office of Personnel Management
91-3357.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Mar 9, 1993.
991 F.2d 809
1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5043
1993 WL 64174
Unpublished

991 F.2d 809

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Patricia A. WILSON, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 91-3357.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 9, 1993.

PER CURIAM.

1

Before ARCHER, MICHEL and PLAGER, Circuit Judges:

Judgment

2

AFFIRMED. Fed.Cir.R. 36.