In re Anonymous, 156 A.D.2d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989). · Go Syfert
In re Anonymous, 156 A.D.2d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Doe v. Connell (nyappdiv, 1992-04-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Doe v. Connell
N.Y. App. Div. · 1992 · confidence medium
Pursuant to that section, HIV-related testing is prohibited without the written informed consent of the person to be tested, except as authorized by CPLR 3121 or otherwise specifically permitted by statute (see, Matter of Anonymous, supra, at 1029).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Anonymous
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 20, 1989.
156 A.D.2d 1028
1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16750
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Prohibition will not lie to review the order of the court directing petitioner to provide a blood sample for use in the prosecution of a criminal action charging him with attempted murder by attempting to infect three police officers with the HIV virus by biting them (see, Matter of James N. v D’Amico, 139 AD2d 302, Iv denied 73 NY2d 703). County Court acted within its authorized powers in compelling petitioner to give blood. CPL 240.40 (2) (a) (v)[*1029] specifically authorizes such an order in a criminal case and, thus, the powers of the court are not circumscribed by Public Health Law § 2781 (1).

Were we to reach the merits, we would hold that County Court did not err in granting the order compelling petitioner to give blood (see, Matter of Abe A., 56 NY2d 288). Moreover, County Court complied with the requirements of section 2785 of the Public Health Law which deals with “Court authorization for disclosure of confidential HIV related information”. (Original art 78 proceeding.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.