People v. Friscia, 107 A.D.3d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). · Go Syfert
People v. Friscia, 107 A.D.3d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Christopher Friscia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 19, 2013.
107 A.D.3d 914
Published

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed March 7, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

[*915] Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Hall, JJ., concur.