green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
21.2 score
Cited for
At page 882 [e]vidence of prior personal drug use is admissible 17 to prove intent in a subsequent prosecution for distribution of narcotics1 citing case
- Peter Hargrove v. State, No. A21A0810 (Ga. Ct. App. Sept. 15, 2021). ([e]vidence of prior personal drug use is admissible 17 to prove intent in a subsequent prosecution for distribution of narcotics)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Matthew Brent FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Matthew Brent FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant
07-14442.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Mar 5, 2008.
267 F. App'x 880
William Gregory Hughes, Mobile, AL, for D efendant-App ell ant., Steven E. Butler, Justice Dept., Civil Rights Division, Employment Litigation Section, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tjoflat, Anderson, Hull.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, counsel for Matthew Brent Findley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Findley’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.