Teneyck, Inc. v. Rosenberg, 111 A.D.3d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Teneyck, Inc. v. Rosenberg, 111 A.D.3d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Teneyck, Inc., Formerly Known as Neill Supply Co., Inc.
v.
Robert D. Rosenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 19, 2013.
111 A.D.3d 529
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered January 11, 2013, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This action is barred by the doctrine of in pari delicto (see Kirschner v KPMG LLP, 15 NY3d 446, 464 [2010]). The parties pleaded guilty in federal court to identical charges stemming from the underlying bribery scheme.

Contrary to plaintiffs contention, the adverse interest excep[*530] tion does not avail it (see id. at 466-467). Apart from plaintiffs guilty plea, the complaint itself demonstrates that plaintiff profited from the bribery scheme.

Plaintiff failed to show that leave to amend the complaint was warranted. Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Richter, ManzanetDaniels and Feinman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 39 Mise 3d 194.]