Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc., 188 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1992). · Go Syfert
Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc., 188 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony J. Fumerelle
v.
Performance Rides, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 30, 1992.
Published opinion
188 A.D.2d 1014
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to plaintiffs. The agreement for the sale of the laundromat business to plaintiffs provides: "Contract subject to assuming or negotiating lease acceptable to purchasers.” The record establishes that plaintiffs were unable to assume or negotiate a lease acceptable to them. Therefore, plaintiffs are entitled to the return of their deposit

[*1015] (see, Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard, 61 NY2d 106, 113; Perna v Desai, 101 AD2d 857, affd 63 NY2d 898). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.