Amica Mut. Ins. Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Leo P. Bourgault, Cheryl Bourgault, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, 996 F.2d 284 (11th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Amica Mut. Ins. Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Leo P. Bourgault, Cheryl Bourgault, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, 996 F.2d 284 (11th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, Appellee,
v.
Leo P. BOURGAULT, Cheryl Bourgault, Defendants-Counter-Claimants, Appellants
92-8068.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jul 27, 1993.
996 F.2d 284
1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19193
1993 WL 255378
Ervin H. Gerson, Stevens & Gerson, Atlanta, GA, for defendants-counter-claimants, appellants., Alan Terry Sorrells, Carter & Ansley, Christopher N. Shuman, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff-counter-defendant, appellee.
Tjoflat, Hatchett, Birch.
Published
PER CURIAM:

On December 10, 1992, we issued an opinion in this case in which we certified to the Georgia Supreme Court the issue of the application of O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11 to insurance policies covering vehicles not principally garaged or used in Georgia. 979 F.2d 187. The Supreme Court of Georgia has responded to our request in its opinion of Arnica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Bourgault, 263 Ga. 157, 429 S.E.2d 908 (1993). That court answered our question in the negative, holding that O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11 does not invalidate an exclusion in an insurance policy covering a vehicle principally garaged and used outside of Georgia.

The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision is consistent with the reasoning of the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.