People v. Gonzalez, 112 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). · Go Syfert
People v. Gonzalez, 112 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Britton (nyappdiv, 2016-06-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Britton
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
Moreover, the court’s instruction to the jury regarding use of this evidence limited any potential prejudice to the defendant (see People v Gopaul, 112 AD3d 964, 965 [2013]; People v Khan, 88 AD3d 1014, 1015 [2011]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) People v. Palencia
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · confidence medium
People v Gopaul, 112 AD3d 964, 965 [2013]; People v Khan, 88 AD3d 1014 [2011]), or involving the same or similar conduct for which he or she is being tried (see e.g.
cited Cited as authority (rule) People v. Palencia
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · confidence medium
People v Gopaul, 112 AD3d 964, 965 [2013]; People v Khan, 88 AD3d 1014 [2011]), or involving the same or similar conduct for which he or she is being tried (see e.g.
cited Cited "see" Gopaul v. Racette
E.D.N.Y · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gopaul, 112 A.D.3d 964, at 965 .
cited Cited "see" Gopaul v. Racette
E.D.N.Y · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gopaul, 112 A.D.3d 964, at 965 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Arcadio N. Gonzalez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 26, 2013.
112 A.D.3d 964
Published

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 7, 2009 (People v Gonzalez, 64 AD3d 615 [2009]), affirming a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, imposed September 19, 2007.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Eng, EJ, Mastro, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur.