In re the Est. of Winston, 222 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
In re the Est. of Winston, 222 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Lassiter (nyappdiv, 2017-06-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Lassiter
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the court should have conducted a hearing to controvert the search warrant based on certain trial evidence (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Davis, 103 AD3d 810, 812 [2013]; People v Accardi, 222 AD2d 596, 597-598 [1995]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Ekwegbalu
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · confidence medium
The defendant failed to demonstrate that he discovered additional facts, not discoverable with reasonable diligence before the determination of the motion, that would have affected the court’s ultimate determination of his suppression motion (see CPL 710.40 [4]; People v Jackson, 97 AD3d 693, 694 [2012]; People v Cepeda, 48 AD3d 294, 295 [2008]; People v Musgrove, 261 AD2d 640, 641 [1999]; People v Accardi, 222 AD2d 596, 597 [1995]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Davis
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The additional grounds advanced by the defendant on appeal in support of his contention that the court should have granted his motion to reopen the hearing are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see People v Accardi, 222 AD2d 596, 597-598 [1995]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Davis
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The additional grounds advanced by the defendant on appeal in support of his contention that the court should have granted his motion to reopen the hearing are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see People v Accardi, 222 AD2d 596, 597-598 [1995]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Estate of Harry Winston, Bankers Trust Company of New York, Respondents Ronald Winston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 18, 1995.
222 A.D.2d 596
1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13271
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

—Appeal by the respondent Ronald Winston from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emanuelli, S.), dated September 18, 1995.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Surrogate Emanuelli. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur. [See, 167 Misc 2d 295.]