People v. Law, 223 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). · Go Syfert
People v. Law, 223 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Nathaniel E. Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 29, 1996.
223 A.D.2d 727
1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 685
Published

Appeal by the[*728] defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), rendered June 28, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.