In re Bambi C., 238 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Bambi C., 238 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: C., ANNABELLA B., MTR. OF (nyappdiv, 2016-02-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) C., ANNABELLA B., MTR. OF
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
It is well settled that “[n]o appeal lies from an order entered upon the parties’ consent” (Matter of Bambi C., 238 AD2d 942, 942-943 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 805 [1997]) and, indeed, we dismissed the mother’s appeal from the consent order for that very reason (Matter of Annabella B.C. [Sandra L.C.], 129 AD3d 1550 [2015]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) in the Matter of Violette K., an Infant. Steuben County Department of Social Services, Respondent Sheila E.K.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
A party may not appeal from an order entered upon that party’s consent (see Matter of Selena O. [Trisha O. —Steven R.], 84 AD3d 1648 [2011]; Matter of Bambi C., 238 AD2d 942, 942-943 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 805 [1997]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) in the Matter of Violette K., an Infant. Steuben County Department of Social Services, Respondent Sheila E.K.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
A party may not appeal from an order entered upon that party’s consent (see Matter of Selena O. [Trisha O. —Steven R.], 84 AD3d 1648 [2011]; Matter of Bambi C., 238 AD2d 942, 942-943 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 805 [1997]).
discussed Cited "see" In re Nasir H.
N.Y. App. Div. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Because respondent did not move to vacate or withdraw her admission (see, Family Ct Act § 1051 [f]; see generally, Family Ct Act § 1061), she is precluded from now challenging the court’s acceptance of her admission on the ground that the court failed to give the required warnings (see, Matter of Bambi C., 238 AD2d 942, 943 , lv denied 90 NY2d 805 ; cf., Matter of Farquhar v Pitt, 192 AD2d 806 ; see generally, Family Ct Act § 1051 [f]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Bambi C. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Shirley C., Appellant Oswego County Department of Social Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 25, 1997.
238 A.D.2d 942
1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4775
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: This appeal must be dismissed. Respondent admitted that she violated the conditions of a prior dispositional order and consented to a finding of neglect and entry of a dispositional order continuing the prior order. No appeal lies from an order[*943] entered upon the parties’ consent (see, Matter of Michael CC., 216 AD2d 740; Matter of Cherilyn P., 192 AD2d 1084, lv denied 82 NY2d 652). Respondent’s remedy is to move to vacate the finding of neglect (see, Family Ct Act § 1051 [f]; Matter of Farquhar v Pitt, 192 AD2d 806). (Appeal from Order of Oswego County Family Court, Roman, J.—Neglect.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Lawton, Balio and Fallon, JJ.