People v. Hanson, 256 A.D.2d 74 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). · Go Syfert
People v. Hanson, 256 A.D.2d 74 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Bauer (nyjustct, 2025-02-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Bauer
nyjustct · 2025 · confidence medium
And, the court adds, no indication was made prior to that proceeding that defendant sought "a combined suppression hearing and nonjury trial" ( People v Hanson , 256 AD2d 74, 74 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 874 [1999]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Bauer
nyjustct · 2025 · confidence medium
And, the court adds, no indication was made prior to that proceeding that defendant sought "a combined suppression hearing and nonjury trial" ( People v Hanson , 256 AD2d 74, 74 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 874 [1999]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Bauer
nyjustct · 2025 · confidence medium
And, the court adds, no indication was made prior to that proceeding that defendant sought "a combined suppression hearing and nonjury trial" ( People v Hanson , 256 AD2d 74, 74 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 874 [1999]).
discussed Cited "see" Baker v. Bauman (2×)
E.D. Mich. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Hanson, 256 A.D.2d 74, 74 , 683 N.Y.S.2d 202, 203 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Jeffrey Hanson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 8, 1998.
256 A.D.2d 74
1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13068
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.) rendered December 17, 1996, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and, sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a determinate term of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

With defendant’s consent, the court properly conducted a combined suppression hearing and nonjury trial (People v Yousef, 236 AD2d 868, lv denied 90 NY2d 866). Counsel’s consent to the procedure employed by the court did not deprive him of effective assistance of counsel. On the existing record,[*75] which defendant has not sought to expand by means of a CPL article 440 motion in order to explore counsel’s strategy (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709), we find that counsel pursued a strategy that was reasonable under the circumstances. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.