In re the Claim of Stylianou, 257 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
In re the Claim of Stylianou, 257 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Matter of MacDonald (Commissioner of Labor) (nyappdiv, 2023-11-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of MacDonald (Commissioner of Labor)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2023 · confidence medium
To the extent that claimant attributed his delay to pursuing legal advice, this did not result in any incapacity so as to excuse his failure to make a timely hearing request ( see Matter of Stylianou [Commissioner of Labor] , 257 AD2d 941, 941-942 [3d Dept 1999]; see also Matter of Green [Commissioner of Labor] , 87 AD3d 1222, 1222 [3d Dept 2011]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Claim of Stella Stylianou, Commissioner of Labor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 28, 1999.
257 A.D.2d 941
1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 766
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 7, 1997, which ruled that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely.

By notices dated November 15, 1995, April 10, 1996 and April 18, 1996, claimant was found to be ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was unable to work, and she was charged with a recoverable overpayment and the loss of benefit days. Claimant failed to request an administrative hearing until December 18, 1996, more than eight months after expiration of the 30-day limitation period established in Labor Law § 620 (1) (a), claiming that she wanted to consult with an attorney prior to requesting a hear[*942] ing. Inasmuch as claimant’s excuse for failing to comply with the statutory requirement was not due to any mental or physical incapacity, we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely (see, Matter of Connors [Commissioner of Labor], 254 AD2d 562; Matter of Samaniego [Park Personnel—Sweeney], 235 AD2d 887).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.