Zapata v. Finkelstein, 259 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Zapata v. Finkelstein, 259 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State Farm Fire & Casualty Co v. Dayco Products, Inc. (nyappdiv, 2005-06-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State Farm Fire & Casualty Co v. Dayco Products, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · confidence medium
Co. v State of New York, 305 AD2d 779, 781 [2003]; Delta Trading Corp. v Effective Plumbing Corp., 259 AD2d 346, 347 [1999]; Compton v D'Amore, 101 AD2d 800, 801 [1984]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Emma Zapata
v.
Reuven Finkelstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 16, 1999.
259 A.D.2d 346
1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2746
Published

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lottie Wilkins, J.), entered on or about July 7, 1998, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment was proper since the present record does not permit a determination, as a matter of law, that there was no interval between the snowfall and consequent accumulation upon which plaintiff claims to have injured herself (see, Croff v Grand Union Co., 205 AD2d 856), or that, if there was an interval, it was insufficient to permit defendant property owners to discover and remedy the hazard (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom and Andrias, JJ.