In re Jeremiah R., 266 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Jeremiah R., 266 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: In Re China E.C. Westchester County Department of Social Services (nyappdiv, 2015-12-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re China E.C. Westchester County Department of Social Services
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · confidence medium
The petitioner agency established by clear and convincing evidence that it exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the relationship between the mother and the subject children (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [f] [3]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 142 [1984]; Matter of Jeremiah R., 266 AD2d 553, 553-554 [1999]), but that the mother failed to complete any court-ordered services or plan for the children’s future (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Craig B.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2003 · confidence medium
Further, the evidence supported the Family Court’s determination that the child’s best interest required termination of the mother’s parental rights and the transfer of custody and guardianship of the child to the Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services to free the child for adoption (see Matter of Star Leslie W., supra at 148; Matter of Jeremiah R., 266 AD2d 553, 554 [1999]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In re Chestina Mae S.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2003 · confidence medium
The paramount concern is the best interests of the children (see Matter of Jeremiah R., 266 AD2d 553, 554 [1999]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Jeremiah R. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Rita R., Appellants Little Flower Children's Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 29, 1999.
266 A.D.2d 553
1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12209
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

—In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother and the father separately appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Rivera, J.), dated November 25, 1997, which, after a hearing, terminated their parental rights to their children Jeremiah, Shamale, and Elijah and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and Little Flower Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this proceeding to terminate parental rights based on permanent neglect, the petitioner agency established by clear and[*554] convincing evidence that it exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the relationship between the parents and the subject children (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 140; Matter of Sheila G., 61 NY2d 368), but that the parents failed to adequately plan for the children’s future (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a], [f]; Matter of Gregory B., 74 NY2d 77; Matter of Alicia Shante H., 245 AD2d 509).

The paramount concern at a dispositional hearing is the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147, supra; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N. Y. v Leona W., 192 AD2d 602, 603). Here, there is ample evidence that the best interests of the subject children would be served by freeing them for adoption by the foster parent and not subjecting them to the potential harm that could result from their being returned to their parents (see, Matter of Sylvia Esther O., 253 AD2d 465). Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.