green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
PerezvFleischer
Church, 267 AD2d 1102, 1102-1103 [1999]; see also Muniz v Preferred Assoc., 189 AD2d at 739 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Perez v. Fleischer
Church, 267 AD2d 1102, 1102-1103 [1999]; see also Muniz v Preferred Assoc., 189 AD2d at 739 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Perez v. Fleischer
Church, 267 AD2d 1102, 1102-1103 [1999]; see also Muniz v Preferred Assoc., 189 AD2d at 739 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William M. Quinn
v.
Eastman Kodak Company
v.
Eastman Kodak Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 30, 1999.
Published
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, VanStrydonck, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, VanStrydonck, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.