People v. Standley, 269 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Standley, 269 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Ross (nyappdiv, 2014-01-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Ross
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · confidence medium
Moreover, by validly pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury (see People v Benitez, 84 AD3d 826, 826-827 [2011]; People v Standley, 269 AD2d 614, 615 [2000]; People v Ferrara, 99 AD2d 257, 259 [1984]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Ross
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · confidence medium
Moreover, by validly pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury (see People v Benitez, 84 AD3d 826, 826-827 [2011]; People v Standley, 269 AD2d 614, 615 [2000]; People v Ferrara, 99 AD2d 257, 259 [1984]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Benitez
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · confidence medium
By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that he was deprived of his right to testify before the grand jury (see People v DeLuca, 45 AD3d 777 [2007]; People v Standley, 269 AD2d 614, 615 [2000]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. DeLuca
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
In any event, by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Beaton, 303 AD2d at 594 ; People v Standley, 269 AD2d 614, 615 [2000]; People v Lyde, 247 AD2d 555 [1998]), and his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel which did not directly involve the plea-bargaining process (see People v Turner, 40 AD3d 1018, 1019 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 882 [2007]; People v Silent, 37 AD3d 625 [2007]; People v Gutierrez, 35 AD3d 883, 884 [2006]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Douglas Standley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 28, 2000.
269 A.D.2d 614
2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2315
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Lefkowitz, J.), rendered November 7, 1997, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, kidnapping in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and criminal contempt in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude him from challenging the voluntariness of his plea (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Nonetheless, we find that the plea was entered into knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). The defendant’s claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397).

[*615] By pleading guilty, the defendant waived his claim that he was denied his right to testify before the Grand Jury (see, People v Franklin, 232 AD2d 577; People v Ferrara, 99 AD2d 257). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.