Sales v. Gisendaner, 272 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2000). · Go Syfert
Sales v. Gisendaner, 272 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 997 “a party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear”4 citing cases4 citing courts quote it
  • Matter of Hilton v. Hilton, 2019 NY Slip Op 4572 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2019).published
    Where, as here, "a party fails to appear [in court on a scheduled date] but is represented by counsel, the order is not one entered upon the default of the aggrieved party and appeal is not precluded" ( Matter of Pollard v Pollard , 63 AD3…
  • Manning, Kathleen S. v. Sobotka, Stanley P., 107 A.D.3d 1638 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2013).published
    “A party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear” (Matter of Sales v Gisendaner, 272 AD2d 997, 997 [2000]; see Erie County Dept. of Social Servs., 91 AD3d at 1328 ).
  • Erie Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. ex rel. Wiser v. Thompson, 91 A.D.3d 1327 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2012).published
    “A party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear” (Matter of Sales v Gisendaner, 272 AD2d 997, 997 [2000]).
  • In re Isaiah H., 61 A.D.3d 1372 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2009).published
    “A party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear” (Matter of Sales v Gisendaner, 272 AD2d 997, 997 [2000]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Mildred Sales
v.
Jeannine Gisendaner
Appeal No. 2.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 10, 2000.
Published opinion
272 A.D.2d 997
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this child custody dispute between a mother and grandmother, Family Court erred in granting the grandmother’s petition without a hearing on the ground that the mother had defaulted in appearing in response thereto. A party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear (see, Matter of Cleveland W., 256 AD2d 1151, 1151-1152; Matter of Robert F, 200 AD2d 899; Matter of Cecelia A., 199 AD2d 582; cf., Matter of Black v Black, 84 AD2d 922). In any event, the court erred in granting the petition summarily (see, Obey v Degling, 37 NY2d 768, 769-770; Matter of Van Etten v Van Etten, 207 AD2d 992). A parent’s right to be heard on a matter of child custody is fundamental and “not to be disregarded absent a convincing showing of waiver” (Matter of Kendra M., 175 AD2d 657, 658; see, Matter of Cleveland W., supra, at 1151). Moreover, transfer of custody from a parent to a nonparent requires a showing of extraordinary circumstances justifying the court’s intervention, followed by a showing that an award of custody to the nonparent is in the child’s best interests (see, Matter of Bennett v Jeffi'eys, 40 NY2d 543, 545-[*998] 549). Those issues may not be determined summarily (see, Matter of Stefanik v Roberts, 266 AD2d 758, citing D’Entremont v DEntremont, 254 AD2d 576, 576-577). Consequently, we reverse the order and remit the matter to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings on the petition before a different Judge. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J. — Custody.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.