People v. Contrano, 274 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Contrano, 274 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Lesson (nyappdiv, 2006-09-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Lesson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · confidence medium
Inasmuch as defendant was released from jail in April 2006, his challenge to the finding of a probation violation has been rendered moot (see People v Contrano, 274 AD2d 760, 760-761 [2000]; People v Hamilton, 214 AD2d 783, 783 [1995]), as has his claim that his resentence was harsh and excessive (see People v Edmunds, 21 AD 3d 578, 581 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 828 [2005]; People v Young, 13 AD3d 716, 718 [2004]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Edmunds
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · confidence medium
Lastly, defendant’s present claim that the sentence was harsh and excessive is moot as defendant was released in July 2004 (see People v Young, 13 AD3d 716, 718 [2004]; People v Contrano, 274 AD2d 760, 761 [2000]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Young
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · confidence medium
Finally, we find defendant’s challenge to the severity of his sentence to be moot inasmuch as the record indicates that he was released in May 2002 after serving his sentence (see People v Contrano, 274 AD2d 760, 761 [2000]; People v Durham, 248 AD2d 820, 823 [1998], lv denied 91 NY2d 972 [1998]).
cited Cited "see, e.g." People v. Parente
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because defendant has completed serving that sentence, his appeal is moot (see People v Griffin, 239 AD2d 936 [1997]; see also People v Contrano, 274 AD2d 760 [2000]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Jamie Contrano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jul 20, 2000.
274 A.D.2d 760
2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8083
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County, rendered July 19, 1999, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was sentenced to five years’ probation following her conviction for two drug-related offenses. Thereafter, defendant admitted to violating a term of her probation. As a result, defendant’s probation was revoked and she was resentenced to a nine-month term of imprisonment on July ,19, 1999. Defendant appeals. Inasmuch as defendant has completed the sentence imposed, her appeal has been rendered moot (see, [*761] People v Hamilton, 214 AD2d 783; People v Anderson, 197 AD2d 749, lv denied 82 NY2d 921). Furthermore, because there is no “recurring issue of public interest which would otherwise escape appellate review, dismissal is appropriate” (People v Anderson, supra).

Cardona, P. J., Spain, Graffeo, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot.