Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Key
The defendant’s claims pertaining to the grand jury presentation were forfeited by his plea of guilty (see People v Crumpler, 70 AD3d 1396, 1397 [2010]; People v Martin, 55 AD3d 1236, 1238 [2008]; People v Greeman, 49 AD3d 463, 464 [2008]; People v Winchester, 38 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2007]; People v Santiago, 305 AD2d 1109, 1110 [2003]; People v Sachs, 280 AD2d 966, 967 [2001]; People v Butler, 198 AD2d 427 [1993]; People v Quackenbush, 98 AD2d 875 [1983]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Winchester
By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contention that he was denied the right to testify before the grand jury (see People v Sachs, 280 AD2d 966, 966-967 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 834 [2001], 97 NY2d 708 [2001]; see generally People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227, 230-232 [2000]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Collier
Defendant further asserts that the second violent felony offender statement is defective for failure to comply with the provisions of CPL 400.15. * He, however, failed to preserve this issue by raising it before County Court (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; People v Sachs, 280 AD2d 966, 966 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 834 [2001]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Frazier
The contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury is “foreclosed by defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal as well as by defendant’s plea of guilty” (People v Duzant, 15 AD3d 860, 861 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 761 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Sachs, 280 AD2d 966 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 834 [2001], 97 NY2d 708 [2002]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Walter
Similarly, any issue concerning the proper interpretation or application of the statute was forfeited by the guilty plea (see People v Salvato, 111 AD2d 773 [1985], lv denied 66 NY2d 618 [1985]; see also People v Sachs, 280 AD2d 966, 967 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 834 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Freeney
Although the sentences are concurrent and both the sentencing minutes and the certificate of conviction provide that defendant was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender to a term of incarceration of 25 years to life, a sentence that we conclude was proper (see, People v Froats, 163 AD2d 906 , lv denied 76 NY2d 940 ; see also, People v Sachs, 280 AD2d 966 , lv denied 96 NY2d 834 ; People v Levine, 257 AD2d 478 , lv denied 93 NY2d 900 ), we nevertheless conclude that discrepancies between the sentencing minutes and the certificate of conviction, omissions in the sentencing minutes, a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
George Burroughs, Also Known as George Barnes, Also Known as George Burrows
v.
George Burroughs, Also Known as George Barnes, Also Known as George Burrows
Appeal No. 2.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 7, 2001.
Published
—Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, People v Burroughs, 280 AD2d 965 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J. — Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.