Rodriguez v. Annucci, 136 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). · Go Syfert
Rodriguez v. Annucci, 136 A.D.3d 1083 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Matter of Singh v. Annucci (nyappdiv, 2019-02-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Singh v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · confidence medium
Accordingly, petitioner's present claim — the he was denied or received incomplete documentary evidence — is unpreserved for our review ( see Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci , 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]; Matter of Monje v Geoghegan , 108 AD3d 957, 957-958 [2013]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vidal v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
Petitioner was not improperly denied this inmate’s testimony as he executed a refusal form indicating that he did not want to be involved and the Hearing Officer personally interviewed the inmate to ascertain the legitimacy of his refusal (see Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]; Canalas Sanchez v Annucci, 126 AD3d 1194, 1195 [2015]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vidal v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
Petitioner was not improperly denied this inmate’s testimony as he executed a refusal form indicating that he did not want to be involved and the Hearing Officer personally interviewed the inmate to ascertain the legitimacy of his refusal (see Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]; Canalas Sanchez v Annucci, 126 AD3d 1194, 1195 [2015]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Gaston v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
While the Hearing Officer failed to inquire further as to the reason for the retaliation concern, since neither inmate raised any contention of actual coercion, we conclude that petitioner’s right to “call witnesses on his behalf” was not violated (7 NYCRR 254.5 [a]; see Wolff v McDonnell, 418 US 539, 566 [1974]; Matter of Cortorreal v Annucci, 28 NY3d 54, 59-60 [2016]; Matter of Taylor v Annucci, 140 AD3d 1433, 1434 [2016]; Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Samuels v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
For the same reason, he has not preserved his claim that he was improperly denied the use of force report (see Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]; Matter of Henry v Fischer, 120 AD3d at 869 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Medina v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
Petitioner’s remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review due to his failure to raise them at the hearing (see Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Williams v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
Further, the record confirms that the Hearing Officer made a sufficient inquiry after one of petitioner’s requested inmate witnesses refused to testify (see Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]; Matter of Thurmond v Fischer, 112 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2013]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Taylor v. Annucci
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
Petitioner further argues that he was improperly denied the right to call relevant inmate witnesses, but the record establishes that the requested witnesses executed refusal forms noting their reasons for not wanting to testify, after which the Hearing Officer personally interviewed the requested witnesses and verified that information (see Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2016]; Matter of Thurmond v Fischer, 112 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2013]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of John A. Rodriguez
v.
Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 4, 2016.
136 A.D.3d 1083
Clark, Egan, Garry, Rose.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, being out of place, making a false statement and refusing a direct order. The charges relate that petitioner attempted to join a group of inmates that had signed up to go to church by giving a false cell number. Petitioner was escorted back to his cell block and, instead of returning to his cell as directed, he hit a correction officer in the head. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

[*1084] We confirm. To the extent challenged by petitioner, the misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony from the correction officer involved in the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of May v Selsky, 291 AD2d 591, 592 [2002]). Petitioner’s contention that he was improperly denied the right to call a witness is belied by the record, which establishes that, in addition to the requested witness executing a refusal form noting the reason for not wanting to testify, the Hearing Officer personally interviewed the requested witness and verified that information (see Matter of Thurmond v Fischer, 112 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2013]; Matter of Tafari v Fischer, 98 AD3d 763, 763 [2012] , lv denied 19 NY3d 816 [2012]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including that he was denied both adequate employee assistance and the right to present documentary evidence, are unpreserved as they were not raised at the hearing (see Matter of Abrams v Fischer, 109 AD3d 1030, 1031 [2013] ).

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.