People v. McLemore, 303 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2003). · Go Syfert
People v. McLemore, 303 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 950 cited at this page1 citing case
  • People v. Dale, 142 A.D.3d 1287 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2016).
    Moreover, the valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses both defendant’s constitutional and statutory double jeopardy claims (see People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 574-575 [1998]; People v McLemore, 303 AD2d 950, 950 [2003], lv denied 100…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Anthony McLemore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 21, 2003.
303 A.D.2d 950
2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2904
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

—Appeal from a judgment of Orleans County Court (Punch, J.), entered August 7, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court “fully apprised him of his right to appeal and the consequences of his waiver of that right, which defendant indicated that he understood” (People v Raquel, 238 AD2d 766, 767 [1997]). Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal therefore is valid (see People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909, 910-911 [1990]), and that waiver encompasses defendant’s double jeopardy claim (see People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 574 [1998]). Present— Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.