Boulter v. Boulter, 147 A.D.3d 1512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Boulter v. Boulter, 147 A.D.3d 1512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Nicol v. Nicol (nyappdiv, 2020-01-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nicol v. Nicol
N.Y. App. Div. · 2020 · confidence medium
Corp ., 158 AD3d 1063 , 1063 [4th Dept 2018]; Boulter v Boulter [appeal No. 1], 147 AD3d 1512, 1512 [4th Dept 2017]; O'Reilly-Morshead v O'Reilly-Morshead , 147 AD3d 1562, 1562 [4th Dept 2017]; Eddy v Antanavige , 126 AD3d 1403, 1403 [4th Dept 2015]; Meenan v Meenan , 103 AD3d 1277, 1277-1278 [4th Dept 2013]; Partners Trust Bank v State of New York [appeal No. 1], 90 AD3d 1514, 1514 [4th Dept 2011]; Knope v Knope , 77 AD3d 1320, 1321 [4th Dept 2010]; Plastic Surgery Group of Rochester, LLC v Evangelisti , 39 AD3d 1265, 1266 [4th Dept 2007]; Pecora v Lawrence , 28 AD3d 1136, 1137 [4th Dept 2006…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of Joseph II. v. Brandy JJ.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Even liberally construing her motion, and the oral argument thereon, we cannot conclude that the mother raised this discrete argument ( cf. Matter of Alger v Jacobs , 169 AD3d 1415 , 1417 [4th Dept 2019]; see also Boulter v Boulter , 147 AD3d 1512, 1512 [4th Dept 2017]; compare Matter of Eldad LL. v Dannai MM. , 155 AD3d 1336, 1338 [3d Dept 2017]), and Family Court cannot be said to have passed upon it ( compare Matter of Jamilah DD. v Edwin EE. , 152 AD3d 998, 1000 [3d Dept 2017]). [FN3] We therefore do not address this unpreserved claim but to say that we would, in any event, find it unpersu…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joshua P. Boulter
v.
Rachelle R. Boulter
Appeal No. 1.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 10, 2017.
147 A.D.3d 1512
Centra, Curran, Peradotto, Scudder, Troutman.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered December 1, 2014. The decision, among other things, determined that it would be in the best interests of the subject child to relocate to Japan with plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Kuhn v Kuhn, 129 AD2d 967, 967 [1987]).

Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Curran, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.