Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ruth v. Elderwood At Amherst
Finally, by failing to raise a contention in her brief opposing the dismissal of her complaint on any other ground, plaintiff has abandoned any further challenge to the court's order ( see Tucker v Kalos Health, Inc. , 202 AD3d 1505, 1506 [4th Dept 2022]; Ciesinski v Town of Aurora , 202 AD2d 984, 984 [4th Dept 1994]).
cited
Cited "see"
C.C. v. Free Methodist Church-USA
Downtown Hosp ., 69 AD3d 801, 801 [2d Dept 2010]; see Tucker v Kalos Health, Inc ., 202 AD3d 1505, 1506 [4th Dept 2022]).
cited
Cited "see"
Shapiro v. Syracuse Univ.
Downtown Hosp. , 69 AD3d 801, 801 [2d Dept 2010]; see Tucker v Kalos Health, Inc. , 202 AD3d 1505, 1506 [4th Dept 2022]).
cited
Cited "see"
Druger v. Syracuse Univ.
Downtown Hosp. , 69 AD3d 801, 801 [2d Dept 2010]; see Tucker v Kalos Health, Inc. , 202 AD3d 1505, 1506 [4th Dept 2022]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Askew
v.
Well Timed Transp., Inc.
v.
Well Timed Transp., Inc.
1138 CA 20-00285.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 4, 2022.
Published
Askew v Well Timed Transp., Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 00796)
Decided on February 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1138 CA 20-00285
| Askew v Well Timed Transp., Inc. |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 00796 |
| Decided on February 4, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1138 CA 20-00285
[*1]JASON E. ASKEW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
WELL TIMED TRANSPORT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
v
WELL TIMED TRANSPORT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
BARTH SULLIVAN BEHR, BUFFALO (DOMINIC M. CHIMERA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICE OF JENNIFER S. ADAMS, WILLIAMSVILLE (REBECCA POSTEK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O'Donnell, J.), entered July 22, 2019. The order denied the motion of defendant Well Timed Transport, Inc. for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Same memorandum as in Brown v Askew ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Feb. 4, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: February 4, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court