v.
Seth D. Greenberg
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.Order entered October 10, 1985 affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated in that part of the opinion below which[*22] holds that respondent Greenberg is entitled to a renewal lease because petitioner’s predecessor knowingly and voluntarily accepted respondent as a successor rent-stabilized tenant in the subject premises.
Hughes, P. J., Riccobono and Parness, JJ., concur.