In re Est. of Miller, 41 A. 532 (1898). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Est. of Miller, 41 A. 532 (1898). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jost Jost v. Kurtz Kurtz, 82 Pa. Super. 205 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1923)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Estate of Elias Miller, Appeal of Benjamin Hauck
Oct 31, 1898.
Published opinion
41 A. 532
1898 Pa. LEXIS 596
E. A. Beddall, for appellant., S. G. M. Hollopeter, for appellee.
Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Williams.
Published
Per Curiam,

It is impossible to sustain the entries upon which the appellant relies as valid book entries in any point of view, nor was any testimony given, or offered, which could supply the deficiencies of the entries. The opinion of the auditing judge is a complete vindication of his rulings and on that the decree is affirmed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.