Commonwealth ex rel. Keegan v. Keegan, 211 A.2d 884 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth ex rel. Keegan v. Keegan, 211 A.2d 884 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth ex rel. Keegan
v.
Keegan
Appeal, No. 414.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Jul 19, 1965.
211 A.2d 884
1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 771
I. Raymond Kremer, for appellant., Albert Ring, with him D’Agui & Del Gollo, for appellee.
Ervin, Flood, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Watkins, Wright.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

The record contains sufficient evidence to corroborate the fact of adultery confessed by the wife. The continued association of relatrix with the person who is alleged to have ravished her is in itself sufficient to indicate her relations with him were voluntary. I think she has forfeited her right to support from the defendant.

Therefore, I respectfully dissent.