D'Errico v. Alberto, 238 N.E.2d 367 (Mass. 1968). · Go Syfert
D'Errico v. Alberto, 238 N.E.2d 367 (Mass. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is obvious that the plaintiffs have attempted to substitute a new cause not intended when the tort action was begun”
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Bengar v. Clark Equipment Co. (mass, 1988-01-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Bengar v. Clark Equipment Co.
Mass. · 1988 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
it is obvious that the plaintiffs have attempted to substitute a new cause not intended when the tort action was begun
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John J. D'Errico & others
v.
Rocco Alberto
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
May 29, 1968.
238 N.E.2d 367
John J. Graham for the plaintiffs., David C. Hawkins, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant., Henry Wise & Robert L. Wise submitted a brief as amici curiae.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)

This bill for a declaratory decree is brought by six residents of the Commonwealth, members of a labor union, against Rocco Alberto, the president of that union, who is Commissioner of Labor and Industries. G. L. c. 231 A. The binding declaration sought is fundamentally whether the defendant can serve simultaneously in the two positions from both of which he receives compensation. The bill cites provisions of G. L. c. 149 as to the duties of the commissioner, and as to fair competition for bidders on construction of public works; alleges that members of the union are employed in such construction; and cites c. 268A, the so called conflict of interest statute. The defendant demurred on the ground, among others, that no controversy is stated. There was no error. No present controversy is stated. G. L. c. 231A, § 1 (as appearing in St. 1945, c. 582). School Comm. of Cambridge v. Superintendent of Schs. of Cambridge, 320 Mass. 516, 518. No question is presented as to the propriety of simultaneous service in the two capacities.

Final decree dismissing bill affirmed.