Rudnicki v. Hearst Corp., 247 N.E.2d 698 (Mass. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Rudnicki v. Hearst Corp., 247 N.E.2d 698 (Mass. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Starpower Communications LLC v. Crown Castle Fiber LLC (dcd, 2025-10-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Starpower Communications LLC v. Crown Castle Fiber LLC
D.D.C. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Int’l, Inc. v. Sherman, 922 N.E.2d 841, 848 (Mass. App. Ct. 2010); see also id. (“contract terms must be set forth with ‘certainty and precision’” (quoting Epstein v. Zwetchkenbaum, 247 N.E.2d 698, 700 (Mass. 1969))).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chester Rudnicki
v.
The Hearst Corporation & others
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
May 1, 1969.
247 N.E.2d 698
1969 Mass. LEXIS 968
Chester Rudnicki, pro se., Gerald May for The Hearst Corporation., Robert T. Capeless for the Boston Herald-Traveler Corporation., Robert J. Hallisey for the Globe Newspaper Company.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

In this action of tort each of the three defendants demurred to the declaration, and each demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff demurred to the answers filed by each defendant and these demurrers were overruled. The plaintiff moved for judgment against all the defendants and this motion was denied. From these orders the plaintiff appealed. The order denying the motion for[*801] judgment was not appealable. Wishnewsky v. Saugus, 325 Mass. 191, 192.

Chester Rudnicki, pro se. Gerald May for The Hearst Corporation. Robert T. Capeless for the Boston Herald-Traveler Corporation. Robert J. Hallisey for the Globe Newspaper Company.

There was no error.

Orders sustaining defendants’ demurrers affirmed.

Orders overruling plaintiff’s demurrers affirmed.

Appeal from order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment dismissed.

Judgments for defendants.