green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Watson v. Walker
First, with respect to the petitioner’s allegations concerning child support, visitation, and custody orders and proceedings, including a related contempt order, to the extent the petitioner was aggrieved by any of those orders, or any perceived irregularity in the Probate and Family Court proceedings, including alleged perjury by Walker and her counsel, and improper conduct by persons not party to these cases, he “has not demonstrated, or even argued, that review of the trial court decision[s] after trial and final judgment will not adequately protect his interests.” Sarno v. Sarno, 422…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Care and Protection of Lorraine
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Mar 5, 1996.
Robert A. Sherman (Peter F. Carr with him) for the mother., Katherine M. Potter for Department of Social Services., Pamela B. Bankert (.Alison Lowe with her) for the minors., Jinanne S.J. Elder & Amy M. Karp, Committee for Public Counsel Services, amicus curiae, submitted a brief.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Because the underlying order in the trial court that was the subject of this G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), proceeding has been vacated, the appeal from a single justice’s order concerning the trial court’s order is moot. The order of the single justice is vacated, and a judgment shall be entered dismissing the petition as moot and not on the merits.
So ordered.