Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission, 44 Haw. 260 (Haw. 1960). · Go Syfert
Search
Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission, 44 Haw. 260 (Haw. 1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HERMAN
v.
VON HOLT v. IZUMO TAISHA KYO MISSION OF HAWAII, AN INCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, JOHN H. WILSON, LEON K. STERLING, THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
No. 4144.
Hawaii Supreme Court.
May 16, 1960.
44 Haw. 260
Norman K. Ghung for respondent-appellant, City and County of Honolulu., Robert M. Rothwell for petitioner-appellee.
Cassidy, Lewis, Maeumoto, Tsukiyama, Wietz.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Ouriam.

The petition for rehearing is granted. Argument will be had on June 30, 1960, at 9:00 A.M.

Counsel are directed to file briefs on the following questions:

(1) Under the facts presented in this case, and without consideration of R.L.H. 1955, Chapter 219, can appellee be allowed an attorney’s fee?
(2) If so, does such allowance constitute taxation of “costs” within the meaning of the first sentence of R.L.H. 1955, § 219-23?
Norman K. Ghung for respondent-appellant, City and County of Honolulu. Robert M. Rothwell for petitioner-appellee.

The Opening Brief shall be filed within 20 days, the Answering Brief within 35 days and the Reply Brief within 40 days from the date hereof.