Newberry v. United States, 26 F.3d 1122 (11th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Newberry v. United States, 26 F.3d 1122 (11th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2020–2023 · …section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis 27 complaints, not just those filed by prisoners. ⚠ not in text
33 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Garlapati v. Chithis (wawd, 2023-12-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Garlapati v. Chithis
W.D. Wash. · 2023 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis 27 1 complaints, not just those filed by prisoners.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Marcos-Chavela v. Graham
W.D. Wash. · 2023 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis 27 complaints, not just those filed by prisoners.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jacobs v. Rosenblum
W.D. Wash. · 2020 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis 27 complaints, not just those filed by prisoners.
discussed Cited "see" (PC) Richardson v. Montgomery
S.D. Cal. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lopez v. Smith, 203 26 F.3d 1122 , 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (discussing 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)); 27 Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing 28 U.S.C. 28 § 1915A(b)).
discussed Cited "see" Luckett v. Sudbury
S.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lopez v. Smith, 203 26 F.3d 1122 , 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (discussing 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)); 27 Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing 28 U.S.C. § 28 1915A(b)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lenore Skinner v. Kijakazi
S.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Court must review and dismiss any 24 ||complaint which is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks monetary relief 25 ||from a defendant who is immune. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 26 F.3d 1122 , 1127 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Alamar v. Soc.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Newberry
v.
United States
93-8001.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jun 15, 1994.
26 F.3d 1122
1994 WL 287718
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: #23,438 of 633,719
Citer courts: W.D. Washington (3)

26 F.3d 1122

Newberry
v.
U.S.[*]

NO. 93-8001

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

June 15, 1994

1

Appeal From: N.D.Ga.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3