Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366 (8th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366 (8th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Waters v. Ricketts (ned, 2016-02-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Waters v. Ricketts
D. Neb. · 2016 · confidence medium
The State relies on the following cases to support its arguments: Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir.1994) (claim moot where challenged statute was declared unconstitutional in companion case); Thayer v. Chiczewski, 705 F.3d 237, 256-57 (7th Cir.2012) (claim for declaratory and injunctive relief moot in light of Seventh Circuit’s invalidation of challenged law in another case); Eagle Books, Inc. v. Difanis, 873 F.2d 1040, 1042 (7th Cir.1989) (claim moot where state supreme court had declared challenged statute unconstitutional).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bishop v. United States ex rel. Holder
N.D. Okla. · 2014 · confidence medium
Thayer v. Chiczewski, 705 F.3d 237, 256-57 (7th Cir.2012) (claim for declaratory and injunctive relief moot in light of Seventh Circuit’s invalidation of challenged law in another case); Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir.1994) (claim moot where challenged statute was declared unconstitutional in companion case); Eagle Books, Inc. v. Difanis, 873 F.2d 1040, 1042 (7th Cir.1989) (claim moot where state supreme court had declared challenged statute unconstitutional); see also Utah Animal Rights Coal. v. Salt Lake City Corp., 371 F.3d 1248, 1257 (10th Cir.2004) (claim moot where cha…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Andy Thayer v. Ralph Chiczewski
7th Cir. · 2012 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Eagle Books, Inc. v. Difanis, 873 F.2d 1040, 1042 (7th Cir.1989) (claim moot where state supreme court declared statute unconstitutional); see also Miller v. Benson, 68 F.3d 163, 165 (7th Cir.1995) (amendment of statute mooted claim); Utah Animal Rights Coal. v. Salt Lake City Corp., 371 F.3d 1248, 1257 (10th Cir.2004) (claim moot where statute repealed); Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir.1994) (claim moot where statute declared unconstitutional in companion case).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Shrink Missouri Government PAC v. Adams (3×) also: Cited "see"
E.D. Mo. · 1998 · confidence medium
Citing those two decisions, plaintiffs claim that contribution limits must be adjusted for inflation, and that, so adjusted using the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), $1,075 today is the equivalent of only $378 in 1976. [9] In holding that a $100 limit on contributions to and from political committees was "too low to allow meaningful participation in protected political speech and association," 34 F.3d at 1366, the court in Day noted that the $1,000 ceiling upheld in Buckley was not a "constitutional minimum," id., a statement which Buckley emphatically supports.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Frontier Refining v. Gorman-Rupp Company
10th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
United States v. Lang, 81 F.3d 955 , 967 n. 6 (10th Cir.1996); Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see" Groshel v. Corley
8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see" Dennis Groshel v. Mary Corley
8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir. 1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Miller v. Glanz
10th Cir. · 2009 · signal: compare · confidence medium
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505, 506 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980); compare Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir.1994) (following Munsingwear procedure when entire case was mooted during appeal of preliminary injunction) with Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Shalala, 53 F.3d 363, 366 (D.C.Cir.1995) (ordering only vacatur of appealed preliminary injunction where mooting event did not affect rest of case).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Christopher Longley Patrick McCarthy Co-Treasurers of the Republican Victory Club Republican Victory Club, a Political Committee
v.
John L. Holahan, Jr., in His Capacity as Chair of the Ethical Practices Board, or His Successor
94-1097.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Sep 1, 1994.
34 F.3d 1366
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

34 F.3d 1366

Christopher LONGLEY; Patrick McCarthy, Co-Treasurers of the
Republican Victory Club; Republican Victory Club,
a political committee, Appellants,
v.
John L. HOLAHAN, Jr., in his capacity as Chair of the
Ethical Practices Board, or his successor,
[*] Appellee.

No. 94-1097.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 16, 1994.
Decided Sept. 1, 1994.

Harlan M. Goulett, of Minneapolis, MN, argued, for appellant.

Jocelyn Furtwangler Olson, St. Paul, MN, argued, for appellee.

Before BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and STEVENS,[**] District Judge.

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

1

The Republican Victory Club and its co-treasurers (collectively RVC) appeal the District Court's denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. RVC sought to enjoin enforcement of the Minnesota law that forbids political committees or funds from accepting "aggregate contributions from an individual, political committee, or political fund in an amount more than $100 a year." Minn.Stat. Sec. 10A.27 subd. 12 (Supp.1993).

2

We have now resolved, on the merits, constitutional challenges made to section 10A.27 subd. 12 in a companion case, Day v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1356 (8th Cir.1994), and we have declared that subdivision to be unconstitutional and unenforceable. Therefore the present case is now moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, vacate the order of the District Court, and remand with instructions that the case be dismissed. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

*

In the companion case of Day v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1356 (8th Cir.1994), Holahan substituted for Vanne Owens Hayes, who was chairman of the Minnesota Ethical Practices Board when plaintiffs filed suit. On the Court's own motion, for consistency between the cases, we have substituted Holahan for Hayes in this case as well

**

The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation