Clark v. Warden, 246 A.2d 316 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1968). · Go Syfert
Clark v. Warden, 246 A.2d 316 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Coleman v. State (mdctspecapp, 1969-10-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Coleman v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1969 · confidence medium
In the light of those factors we concluded that the in-court (trial) identification was not the product of an unconstitutionally tainted pretrial confrontation. 5 Md.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOSEPH CLARK
v.
WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY
No. 4.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.
Oct 10, 1968.
246 A.2d 316
1968 Md. App. LEXIS 370
Published
Per Curiam.

This is an application for leave to appeal from an order of Judge Joseph R. Byrnes, dated October 20, 1967, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore denying relief sought by the applicant in his fourth petition under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act. The Court of Appeals of Maryland has twice denied his applications for leave to appeal — Clark v. Warden, 225 Md. 639; Clark v. Warden, 233 Md. 625 — and this Court denied his application for leave to appeal his third petition in an unpublished opinion filed May 12, 1967, (Clark v. Warden, No. 63, Initial Term, 1967).

This application (filed February 8, 1968) must be denied since it was not filed within thirty days from the passage of Judge Byrnes’ order as required by Maryland Code, Art. 27, Sec. 645 I and Md. Rule BK 46 a. See Bynum v. Warden, 230 Md. 631.

Application denied.