State v. Salters, 17 S.E. 724 (S.C. 1893). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Salters, 17 S.E. 724 (S.C. 1893). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thomas v. Lynch (sc, 1910-09-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thomas v. Lynch
S.C. · 1910 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, State v. Keels, 39 S. C., 553, 17 S. E., 724 , a case very-much like the one under consideration. ■ 2 There is another reason why the motion could' not 'be. entertained, even if I had jurisdiction; because the notice thereof and the affidlavits upon which it is. based were not served upon the opposite party, as required by rule 19 of the Supreme Court. • The motion is, therefore, dismissed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Salters
No. 3176.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
May 4, 1893.
17 S.E. 724
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

April Term, 1893. On the call of this cause for a hearing, no one appeared for the defendant, appellant. Whereupon, on motion of Mr. Solicitor Wilson, for the State, the appeal was declared abandoned for want of prosecution. Order per curiam,