United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of Am. v. Bourne Bobby Thomas, 37 F.3d 454 (9th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of Am. v. Bourne Bobby Thomas, 37 F.3d 454 (9th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Guy Westmoreland (ca7, 2013-03-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Guy Westmoreland
7th Cir. · 2013 · confidence medium
For example, in United States v. Solorio, 37 F.3d 454, 460-61 (9th Cir.1994), the Ninth Circuit initially reversed a defendant’s drug conviction on an outrageous conduct theory because the court believed that the amount the government paid to an informant had depended on the defendant’s eventual conviction and the quantity of drugs involved.
examined Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Rosario Montoya, United States of America v. Filiberto E. Montoya (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
United States v. Solorio, 37 F.3d 454, 457 (9th Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Towne
D. Mass. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Solorio, 37 F.3d 454 (9th Cir.1994) (contingent informers’ fees), withdrawn and superseded by, 53 F.3d 341 (9th Cir.1995); United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373, 380-381 (3d Cir.1978) (government established, stocked, and ran an illegal drug laboratory).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas
93-50507.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 20, 1994.
37 F.3d 454
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

37 F.3d 454w

63 USLW 2190

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Teofilo SOLORIO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bourne Bobby THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 93-50507, 93-50508.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1994.
Decided Sept. 20, 1994.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION