Jordan v. Dep't of Labor, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1247 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Jordan v. Dep't of Labor, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1247 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matter of Phillip M. v. Precious B. (nyappdiv, 2019-06-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Phillip M. v. Precious B.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · confidence medium
Initially, the parties are unable to reach a consensus or communicate on issues related to the child, rendering joint custody inappropriate ( id. at 955; see Sendor v Sendor , 93 AD3d 586, 587 [1st Dept 2012]; see also Bast v Rossoff , 91 NY2d 723, 728 [1998]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of D.T. (A.G.)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2024 · signal: compare · confidence low
At the same time, the record did not reflect that there had been any disputes between the parties over any major issue concerning the child, nor that the parties' relationship was marked by such acrimony and mistrust that joint custody would not be a viable option ( see Matter of Koegler v Woodard , 96 AD3d 454 , 458 [1st Dept 2012], lv dismissed 19 NY3d 1013 [2012]; compare Lubit v Lubit , 65 AD3d 954 , 955 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 716 [2010], cert denied 560 US 940 [2010]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matter of D.T. (A.G.)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2024 · signal: compare · confidence low
At the same time, the record did not reflect that there had been any disputes between the parties over any major issue concerning the child, nor that the parties' relationship was marked by such acrimony and mistrust that joint custody would not be a viable option ( see Matter of Koegler v Woodard , 96 AD3d 454 , 458 [1st Dept 2012], lv dismissed 19 NY3d 1013 [2012]; compare Lubit v Lubit , 65 AD3d 954 , 955 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 716 [2010], cert denied 560 US 940 [2010]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Douglas H. v. C. Louise H.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Frye v United States (293 F 1013 [DC Cir 1923]) does not require the exclusion of a forensic report solely because it does not cite to the professional literature supporting the evaluator’s opinion (Straus v Strauss, 136 AD3d 419 [1st Dept 2016]; see also Lubit v Lubit, 65 AD3d 954 , 955-956 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 716 [2010], cert denied 560 US 940 [2010]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jack L. Jordan
v.
Department of Labor
No. 09-1201.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 1247
Published

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 187.