State v. Cottle, 61 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. 1950). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Cottle, 61 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. 1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
JOHNNY COTTLE, JAMES COTTLE and EDGAR RENFROW
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 1, 1950.
61 S.E.2d 594
1950 N.C. LEXIS 574
Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Rhodes for the State. , A. M. Britt for defendants, appellants.
Winborne.
Published
WiNBORNE, J.

When the evidence shown in the record on this appeal is considered in the light most favorable to the State, it appears to be sufficient to take the case to the jury, and to support a verdict of guilty as to each appealing defendant on each of the counts submitted to the jury. _

_ It is manifest that the defendants were acting under an agreement to do the unlawful act charged. Hence the exception to the denial of defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit is without merit.

Also, the exception to the charge of the court fails to show error. The crimes charged were properly defined by the court, and the case was fairly presented to the jury.

And error is not made to otherwise appear.

Hence in the judgment below, there is

No error.